<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MDBitz Development Resources &#187; Antipattern</title>
	<atom:link href="http://resources.mdbitz.com/tags/antipattern/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://resources.mdbitz.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:25:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>The Constant Interface Antipattern &#8211; How not to define constants</title>
		<link>http://resources.mdbitz.com/2010/03/the-constant-interface-antipattern-how-not-to-define-constants/</link>
		<comments>http://resources.mdbitz.com/2010/03/the-constant-interface-antipattern-how-not-to-define-constants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MDBitz - Matthew Denton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antipattern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[import static]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resources.mdbitz.com/?p=1097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When working in applications that utilize a lot of variables I often come across interfaces containing nothing but constants. Instead of creating a class containing the constants the developers choose to define them in an interface that can be implemented by a class so that constants don&#8217;t need to be qualified to a class in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://resources.mdbitz.com/2010/03/the-constant-interface-antipattern-how-not-to-define-constants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

