<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MDBitz Development Resources &#187; CSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://resources.mdbitz.com/tags/css/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://resources.mdbitz.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:25:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Tables are still viable HTML elements</title>
		<link>http://resources.mdbitz.com/2010/02/tables-are-still-viable-html-elements/</link>
		<comments>http://resources.mdbitz.com/2010/02/tables-are-still-viable-html-elements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MDBitz - Matthew Denton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HTML/CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Float]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Table]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips & Tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resources.mdbitz.com/?p=911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every day it seems more and more web developers seem to think that tables should not be used. Instead all we see now a days is style=&#8221;float: left&#8221; or style=&#8221;float:right&#8221;, even when all the developer is trying to do is create columns. Why do we need to complicate things. If you are creating multiple columns [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://resources.mdbitz.com/2010/02/tables-are-still-viable-html-elements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the difference between: em vs i, and strong vs bold</title>
		<link>http://resources.mdbitz.com/2009/10/what-is-the-difference-between-em-vs-i-and-strong-vs-bold/</link>
		<comments>http://resources.mdbitz.com/2009/10/what-is-the-difference-between-em-vs-i-and-strong-vs-bold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MDBitz - Matthew Denton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HTML/CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[em]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resources.mdbitz.com/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Often when working on multiple projects and in various frameworks I find that the &#60;em&#62; and &#60;i&#62; tags in addition to &#60;strong&#62; and &#60;bold&#62; are used interchangeably.  After much confusion I finally went and looked up why both of these tags exists. As it turns out the &#60;i&#62; and &#60;b&#62; tags were created to denote [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://resources.mdbitz.com/2009/10/what-is-the-difference-between-em-vs-i-and-strong-vs-bold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

